Power Plant Performance
Improvements Through the Control of Tramp Air In-Leakage
William Hilliard
System Engineer, Carolina Power & Light
Greg Rapier, President,
Air Flow Technologies, Inc.
Jenifer Rush, Vice President, Cost Effective Maintenance, Inc.
Air
in-leakage in the back pass of boilers has significant negative
impact on precipitator performance and fan horsepower as well as
boiler efficiency and capacities. That same leakage can create cool
ductwork internal surfaces, which lead to acid dewpoint corrosion by
moisture condensation which causes severe duct deterioration, air
heater corrosion, air heater plugging and fan corrosion. As with all
air in-leakage, additional mass flow negatively impacts all fan and
electrostatic precipitator capacity oriented components. An
effective strategy in reducing overall air in-leakage has been
developed and used in the southeast. This strategy is a combination
of technologies and products applied in various back pass airflow
applications with similar results. This paper will discuss case
studies illustrating the strategy and results.
L.V.
Sutton Unit No. 2 is a Babcock & Wilcox reheat type steam generator
owned by Carolina Power & Light Company. The boiler which was built
in 1954 was designed to provide a maximum continuous steam capacity
of 775,000 lb/hr with a superheater outlet pressure of 1585 psig and
temperature of 1005°F to a 100 Mw reheat - regenerative cycle
turbine generator.
Recognizing the age of the ductwork from the air heater inlet
through the stationary dampers at the I.D. fan outlets, along with
reduced performance, Carolina Power & Light Company realized the
need for significant rehabilitation. Air Flow Technologies Inc., a
regular supplier, was engaged to accurately assess existing
conditions, survey and recommend repair and replacement options.
To
verify these recommendations, Mr. R. M. Shreiner, PE, was brought in
by
Air Flow Technologies to inspect, test, evaluate data, make
recommendations, and predict performance improvements.
The
basis for the evaluation by Air Flow Technologies was a static
pressure check and oxygen monitoring, performed by plant personnel
to determine system air leakage at various locations.
The
following table represents this air in-leakage percent, as
determined by measuring free oxygen in the flue gas system. The
total average air in-leakage for both sides (fans) was 60%.
Considering the age of the system, reasonable leakage should be no
greater than 20% to 25%. Excessive air in-leakage will decrease the
effective capacity of the ID fans and increase pressure drops
downstream of the leakage, thus decreasing steam flow and MW outputs
because of the extra capacity and static pressure required by the ID
fans.
The
following table represents Air In-Leakage Percentages at key
locations:
|
Air In-Leakage
|
"A" Side
|
"B" Side
|
|
Leakage %
|
Leakage %
|
|
Boiler Output Air Leakage |
OK
|
OK
|
|
Boiler Output to Economy Outlet |
2.31
|
5.91
|
|
Economy Outlet to ESP Inlet |
4.15
|
2.06
|
|
Across ESP |
1.31
|
1.47
|
|
ESP Outlet to A.H. Inlet |
0.29
|
2.37
|
|
Across Air Heater |
8.44
|
19.77
|
|
A.H. Outlet to ID Fan Inlet |
39.6
|
33.3
|
|
Total In-Leakage |
56.1
|
64.88
|
Average
Total In-Leakage Both Sides 60.49%
The above data shows that nearly 60% additional air is being moved
through the system resulting from air in-leakage. The largest
contributor to this leakage is across the air heater and in the
ductwork from the Air Heater Outlet to the ID Fans. Within the
ductwork from the Air Heater to the ID Fans was a Mechanical Dust
Collector which was used prior to the installation of Precipitators
in 1974. The ductwork geometry, as well as the somewhat restricted
flow through the mechanical dust collector, created additional
static pressure losses which further reduced capacities.
After
evaluation of the data and equipment, Air Flow Technologies
recommended the replacement of the existing ductwork with a
redesigned configuration that allowed for the elimination of the
mechanical collector. New high temperature nonmetallic expansion
joints were recommended for the new duct as well as at other
locations where the existing metal joints were deteriorating. These
recommendations were incorporated into the scope of the project.
Predicted Performance
It was
predicted that the removal of the mechanical collector, adjusting
the Air Heater seals, along with the installation of redesigned
ductwork and new expansion joints would have the capability of
increasing megawatt output by 13%. The system may not be operated at
that higher rate, but the fans would provide this capability. The
predicted increase in megawatt capacity was 4.5%. The improvement in
ID fan capacity was predicted to be 36%.
Direct
Cost of Amp Reduction =
Kilowatt * annual operating hours * cost per kWh
= 546.1
kW * 8000 hours/year * 0.02 $/kWh
= $ 87.383
Operating at peak load for approximately 500 hours produces the
following:
= 2.0 Mw * 20 $/Mw * 500 hours
= $ 20,000.00
Precipitator Air In-leakage
Mayo
Unit #1 is comprised of two Foster Wheeler pulverized coal fired
boilers owned by Carolina Power & Light Company. Each steam
generator is designed to provide 2,750,000 pounds per hour of steam
at 1005° F and 2,580 psig at the superheater outlet to a single
817,600 KVA tandem-compound, quadruple flow, single reheat turbine.
Mayo
Unit #1 was experiencing performance related problems associated
with air in-leakage at the seal separating the precipitator hot roof
and the penthouse. Poor performance of this seal allowed for leakage
at several locations. The relatively cold ambient air quenched the
hot roof causing localized buckling which further increased the
leakage. The buckling also caused plate and electrode alignment
problems. Air in-leakage into the precipitator caused severe
performance challenges from ash re-entrainment, increased
velocities, and allowing moisture to enter into the gas stream which
caused severe opacity problems, induced spark over the insulators
and warp collector plates. Due to these operating problems, the unit
was not available for full load at various times.
Rather
than making repairs similar in design to the original construction,
Carolina Power & Light opted to install an ISOMEMBRANEŽ seal around
the hot roof perimeter of the units four precipitators.
ISOMEMBRANEŽ is a product designed and applied by High Temperature
Technologies, Inc., who is the North American Licensee for the
product and a regular supplier to Carolina Power & Light Company.
The ISOMEMBRANEŽ seal provided the ability to maintain an air tight
seal over the existing expansion joint without having to remove or
demolish the existing equipment. The ability to install over the
existing seal allowed for very minor disruption to other activities
scheduled on all four precipitators during this same outage. The
challenges for the seal were that it had to handle 8 inches of
perimeter expansion as well as be able to withstand the elements of
weather as the seal was to be placed outside the unit.
In
addition to the ISOMEMBRANEŽ seals, sixty four expansion joints were
either replaced or were repaired during the outage. It should be
noted that although the seventy two (72) expansion joints, repaired
or replaced, all contributed to some extent in the total air
in-leakage; the availability of the unit was affected primarily by
the problems associated with the precipitator seals.
Actual Performance
The
actual increase in MW capacity, as operated, was reported to be in
excess of 4.5% during hot weather conditions when the boiler was
previously ID fan limited. The ID fans are currently operated at 55%
damper position compared to 100% prior to redesign. The fan motor
amperage was reduced from an average of 193.7 to an average of 155.8
amps. The ID fan inlet pressure was reduced from an average of 18.5
in. to 13.5 in.
Much of
the leakage in the duct, expansion joints, and fan casing was the
result of corrosion caused while the unit was off-line by moisture
and subsequent acid dewpoint attack of the duct surfaces. This was
from the air that was pulled through the F.D. fans, air heater, ID
fans and ductwork by the stack draft. It was decided to install
guillotine dampers above the ID fan outlet in order to eliminate
this stack draft and improve the long-term maintenance of the unit
during periods of shutdown.
Poor
system reliability as a result of the overall condition of the
ductwork, expansion joints, and fan casing was the primary reason
for the refurbishment project. Design changes in the ductwork
configuration, as well as removal of the mechanical collector,
resulted in additional operating savings. A summary of the project
scope and costs are shown below.
°Project
involved 100 tons of ductwork, 28 expansion joints, six dampers and
new casing for both ID fans. All existing equipment was demolished
and reinstalled during an 8 week turbine outage in 1995. The total
cost including installation was $800,000.
°The potential savings from reduced fan amperage for the ID fan
motors is $87,383.
L.V. Sutton Unit #2 was also able to produce an additional 2.0 Mw of
electricity at peak operation. This would allow an additional
$20,000
°Total potential savings exceed $100,000 per year.
In order
to calculate a dollar value for the savings, the following
calculations are used:
kW =
1.732 * Amps * Volts
Amps = 2 Motors * (193.7 - 155.8) = 75.8 Amps
Volts = 4160 Buss Volts
8000
hour/year of operation kW
= 1.732 * 75.8 amps * 4160/1000 kV
$0.02 / kWh kW = 546.1
°Prior
to the outage, the total air in-leakage from the economizer outlet
through the precipitator outlet was an average of 26%.
°After
the outage, the total air in-leakage through the same location was
4%.
°The
project involved the application of ISOMEMBRANEŽ seals on four (4)
precipitators, replacing sixty four (64) expansion joints, and
repairing eight (8) economizer outlet expansion joints using
ISOMEMBRANEŽ.
The
increased reliability and availability of the unit relating to the
installation of the ISOMEMBRANEŽ at the penthouse seals was clearly
recognized by plant operations. The costs and savings associated
with the improved reliability of the precipitator has been
significant.
In
conclusion, operational performance can be dramatically increased
through economically efficient processes designed to abate air
in-leakage. Precipitator performance will improve through reduction
of opacity and lower gas velocities. Air in-leakage also contributes
heavily to limiting units to ID fan capacity. By reducing air
in-leakage, we have shown a tremendous increase in unit efficiency
and performance.
Return to Top